Decoding the New U.S. Dietary Guidelines with Simon Hill: What They Got Right, Wrong & Why It Matters

March 26, 2026·1 hr 1 min·4 clips

Simon Hill reveals that politicians, not scientists, wrote the new U.S. dietary guidelines.

The guidelines arrive already contested. The cold open frames the Trump administration's remake of America's food pyramid as something with real promise, real confusion, and the familiar problem of federal policy giving highly processed food too much cover. Simon Hill comes in to slow the whole thing down. He does not treat protein as a clean win. He keeps pulling the conversation back to source, substitution, and what people may hear when official guidance sounds even slightly friendly to red meat. That is the tension in the excerpt. The concern is not that protein awareness has no value. It is that protein can take up all the oxygen while the harder, less glamorous gaps sit right there. Fiber is the quiet problem. Hill says 95% of Americans are nowhere near fiber recommendations, which makes a protein first message feel incomplete, and in places pretty misleading. Movement matters too. One of the clearest turns comes when Hill separates eating more protein from giving the body a training stimulus. Sedentary people can raise protein a lot without seeing strength or muscle gains. Resistance training is what makes the extra protein useful. In the analysis he cites, even the first hour a week matters, and most of the strength benefit shows up around 1.2 grams of protein per kilogram, with meaningful gains up to about 1.5. After that, the payoff gets small. His towel image lands because it is so plain: going from 1.2 to 1.5 grams per kilogram is like squeezing out the last drips of water. Older adults get a fair caveat. Appetite can drop with age, and protein can fall below 1 gram per kilogram, so Hill leaves room for targeted protein emphasis. He just does not let it become the whole public health story. The better advice is less flashy: source matters. Hill would rather see guidance push people toward fatty fish over red meat and poultry, because that can preserve adequate protein while lowering saturated fat and improving unsaturated fat and fiber patterns. The close gets practical, pointing listeners to realfood.theproof.com, Canada's guidelines, The Proof Podcast, and a conversation with Christopher Gardner and Ty Beale for advice that feels less abstract.

As heard by us

A practical look at protein, fiber, movement, and the mixed signals in new U.S. dietary advice.

The new U.S. dietary guidelines give Rich Roll and Simon Hill a focused way into a bigger problem: what happens when protein dominates the public nutrition conversation.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Someone finally stress-tested the new U.S. dietary guidelines -- and the protein emphasis did not survive intact.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Rich Roll Podcast