Carne Cruda Podcast · La República Independiente de la Radio

¿Hasta dónde pueden llegar Trump y Netanyahu? (CARNE CRUDA #1647)

April 9, 2026·1 hr 3 min·4 clips

The host warns that the entire country could be annihilated tomorrow, with Trump's finger on the trigger and Netanyahu pulling it.

1. Carne Cruda #1647 covers the US-Iran ceasefire of April 8 and Israel's simultaneous large-scale bombing of Lebanon, in a format combining a live field report from Beirut with three in-studio analysts. 2. Independent journalist Marta Maroto reports from Beirut, Jesús Núñez is co-director of the Institute for Conflict and Humanitarian Action Studies, Natalia Sancha is a journalist and former El País Lebanon correspondent, and Carlos Hernández de Echeverría is a professor at Carlos III University specializing in the United States. 3. The episode's central question is how far Trump and Netanyahu can each push their respective agendas given that they appear to be pursuing contradictory strategies: Trump toward deal-making, Netanyahu toward territorial expansion. 4. Israel launched over 160 attacks in less than 10 minutes on Lebanon on the day of the episode, killing at least 254 people including 12 paramedics and a dozen funeral mourners in the Bekaa, and destroying at least five bridges to isolate the south of the country. 5. Marta Maroto describes witnessing the bombing from a Beirut park that had become an informal camp for displaced families, many of whom had spent the night on the road toward their homes believing a ceasefire was in effect. 6. The US-Iran ceasefire was mediated by Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who announced it in the early morning of April 8 after Trump had threatened to 'annihilate a whole civilization in a single night.' 7. The agreement involves Iran opening the Strait of Hormuz, receiving two million dollars per ship crossing, and lifting of UN sanctions, in exchange for limits on its nuclear program and cessation of regional proxy support — though Trump and Iran publicly disputed whether the deal was based on Iran's 10-point plan or Trump's 15-point plan. 8. Jesús Núñez argues that Israel's attack on Lebanon was not a ceasefire violation but part of a pre-existing plan to redraw the regional map — starting from Syria after Assad's fall, through Lebanon, toward Iran — and that Netanyahu felt unbound because the US did not consult him before announcing the ceasefire. 9. He presents the asymmetric war framework: the US must completely eliminate Iran's capacity to resist, while Iran only needs to survive and keep one missile or one mine in Hormuz to claim victory and maintain domestic legitimacy. 10. Carlos Hernández de Echeverría argues Trump will declare a victory narrative regardless — pointing to Hormuz oil transit as proof of success — because his base remains attached and the MAGA world has few figures willing to publicly break with him on this. 11. He notes one exception: Tucker Carlson criticized Trump for his Easter weekend statements and that some MAGA figures invoked the 25th Amendment, though he considers their chances of removing Trump negligible given the current cabinet composition. 12. Natalia Sancha rejects the Brussels narrative that Netanyahu's hardliners are marginal, arguing 20 years in power have allowed him to control all media and embed a militarist narrative through mandatory three-year military service, resulting in 84% public support for the Iran war despite opposition protests. 13. She argues Netanyahu's wars can only continue because 70% of Israel's weapons come from the United States and 30% from Germany, with additional European donations. 14. Sancha notes Israel's policy of assassinating negotiators: the negotiator Ali was killed when nuclear talks were advancing, Nasrallah was killed during Lebanon negotiations, and Hani was killed during Gaza talks. 15. Jesús Núñez identifies Netanyahu's three motivations for prolonged war: recovering his image from the October 7 security failure, delaying corruption trials that carry prison sentences, and securing electoral advantage before October elections. 16. Natalia Sancha reports that Iranians she met on a pilgrimage in Iraq, including those previously skeptical of the clerical regime, now say 'I will defend my country first,' illustrating that US attacks have consolidated domestic support around the regime — the opposite of Trump's stated goal of regime change. 17. The tone is partisan and analytical: the hosts use explicit comparisons to Nazi Germany and describe the Trump-Netanyahu relationship in terms of historical parallels with Hitler-Mussolini, while the analysts offer more measured structural analysis. 18. The format combines a live phone report from Beirut with a panel discussion of three analysts, separated by music from The Idols (a Bristol band whose song 'Set Fire' is used as editorial commentary). 19. Listeners who follow Middle East geopolitics closely and want context beyond headline news — including the military logic of asymmetric warfare, Iranian domestic dynamics, and the weapons supply chain — will find the panel analysis detailed and specific. 20. Those who want factual reporting without editorial framing will find the host's commentary, which includes comparisons to Nazism and references to 'sionazis,' strongly opinionated.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Carne Cruda Podcast