The Sonia Elijah Podcast · Investigative journalism, forensic style

"The truth about Covid was not being told in so many ways"

·1 hr 5 min·20 clips

The guest begins by laying out his background in the United States Marine Corps as a WMD defense professional. He says his work focused on biological, chemical, and nuclear threats, and that he spent eight of those years with the Department of State. He also says he was an instructor who rewrote curriculum for new officers, which left him very familiar with the military side of this kind of research. When the pandemic hit, he says he was only two classes away from finishing an MBA and never went back. Instead, he says he started doing this full time because something felt wrong almost immediately, and he says he was sick early in the pandemic himself. The host asks him to explain what felt off, and he gives an example from being in Prague. The discussion then turns to the idea that there were HIV-like inserts in the spike protein. He says that concern comes from a preprint published on January 31st, 2020 by Indian scientists, which he identifies as the Pradhan et al paper. He says that paper pointed to pieces in the SARS-CoV-2 spike that seemed similar to HIV, and he emphasizes the timing: the next day, he says, Dr. Fauci held an infamous teleconference with scientists from around the world, including Jeremy Farrar and authors of papers supporting a natural origin. He argues that the sequence of events made the response look rushed. He says his own research into censorship led him to ask why those inserts mattered so much. He then links the issue to a diffuse proposal he had published. He says that proposal does not use the word HIV, but it does discuss DC-SIGN, which he describes as a receptor pathway into immune cells. He contrasts that with furin cleavage, another way viruses get into cells. He says DC-SIGN is especially important because very few viruses can use it effectively. He argues that the identified spike fragments sit where they would matter if someone wanted the virus to attach through DC-SIGN, and that they would also matter for direct infection of T cells. The host interrupts to clarify the terminology and keep the technical thread moving. In the closing stretch, the guest introduces fusion inhibitors. He says a doctor had talked about that drug class and had helped invent it with a protege and Ralph Gehry. He connects Ralph Gehry to the February 1 teleconference and to the group of scientists who later wrote the proximal origin paper. He calls that paper the main disinformation piece because it claimed the furin cleavage site was not natural. He says that once he saw that connection, it became hard to believe Fauci and the other scientists did not know sooner. He adds that fusion inhibitors had not really been discussed in the West, while China had already found several that work as pan-coronavirus prophylaxis. The conversation ends with that as a troubling implication rather than a neat conclusion.

As heard by us

A chronology-driven Covid-origins discussion that keeps circling back to the first appearance of the claimed evidence.

This episode follows a former Marine Corps WMD defense professional as he lays out why the pandemic felt off to him early and why he thinks the origin story was blurred.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a Covid-origins argument that stays close to dates, documents, and technical claims.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Sonia Elijah Podcast