The Root Cause Medicine Podcast · Rupa Health

How Evidence-Based Medicine Shapes Patient Care: Episode Rerun

·38 min·2 clips

Evidence-based medicine has only been around for about 30 years, and guidelines are not the truth.

1. The Root Cause Medicine Podcast episode centers on evidence-based medicine, patient care, and Dr. Alan Sussman’s book Saving the Art of Medicine. 2. Dr. Keri Jones hosts Dr. Alan Sussman, a board-certified endocrinologist, researcher, and physician with over 30 years of experience. 3. The episode asks whether evidence-based medicine should be treated as truth or as one path among several. 4. Dr. Sussman says evidence-based medicine has been around for about 30 years, while scientific medicine has been around for about 100 years. 5. He argues that guidelines are not the truth, but a direction created from grouped studies and expert judgment. 6. He says patients should be allowed to question guidelines and consider other paths for care. 7. He uses a hypercholesterolemia example to show how too much evidence can confuse patients rather than clarify choices. 8. He tells patients that much of what he says will change in five years, but the relationship will remain. 9. He describes bias in study reporting as a tendency to publish what researchers want to see. 10. He says study design itself can be biased because researchers try to “roll the dice in your favor.” 11. He uses the gorilla-suit psychology study, where 50% of observers missed the gorilla at first, to show how attention shapes observation. 12. He argues that patient care should be collaborative because the patient knows what is happening in their own body. 13. He says older medical culture assumed doctors knew everything and patients should simply listen. 14. He discusses acupuncture and body work as examples where placebo-style comparisons can be difficult to define. 15. He says placebo effects matter enough that he coined the term “Therapeutic Interventional Potential,” or TIP. 16. He explains that a placebo can still produce benefit, including in an irritable bowel syndrome study where patients were told they were receiving a placebo. 17. The conversation shifts to statistical significance versus clinical significance, with Dr. Sussman stressing that a study result can be statistically real but not meaningful for a patient. 18. He gives an osteoporosis example where a 50% relative risk reduction meant a 6% fracture chance falling to 3% over three years. 19. The episode stays conversational and interview-driven, with Dr. Jones challenging points and Dr. Sussman answering in a reflective, explanatory style. 20. People interested in hormone therapy, research bias, and patient-centered medicine will get the most from it, while listeners wanting a quick clinical answer may skip it.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Root Cause Medicine Podcast