The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast · Jack Symes | Andrew Horton, Oliver Marley, Rose de Castellane, Gregory Mill

Episode 139, Unanswered Questions

February 9, 2025·54 min·5 clips

Olly admits he's a 'victim' of whatever philosophy he's just read, from Buddhism to utilitarianism.

This episode features hosts Jack Symes and Olly Marley in their first solo conversation after a planned debate with Stephen Law at Oxford was lost due to technical issues. They use this impromptu session to answer years of accumulated audience questions on diverse philosophical topics. The hosts reflect on their long-running podcast and share personal insights on ethics, favorite episodes, and public engagements. Jack and Olly discuss their personal ethical frameworks, with Olly describing himself as a "magpie" influenced by Buddhist philosophy, utilitarianism like Peter Singer's work, and situation ethics. They analyze a theological debate between J.D. Vance and Rory Stewart on interpreting the Christian ethic, referencing the Parable of the Good Samaritan. The conversation covers simulation theory, linking it to David Chalmers' book "Reality+" and comparing it to Cartesian doubt. They share favorite podcast episodes, notably the humorous "Flowers for Algernon" discussion and interviews with guests like Rebecca Goldstein and Peter Hitchens. Olly expresses interest in future guests like John Gray and Julian Baggini, while Jack mentions enjoying interviews with Michael Rosen and Christian Miller. A listener question prompts Jack to recount his experience on the Joe Rogan Experience, including an amusing incident with a dog backstage. Jack addresses the ethical considerations of appearing on platforms that have hosted misinformation, emphasizing maintaining his values. Both hosts agree there is likely no topic they would refuse to cover on their show if approached with their standard rigorous and balanced research. They highlight their method of thoroughly explaining ideas before offering critique as a model for handling sensitive subjects. The tone is warm, conversational, and filled with friendly banter, reflecting their long-term friendship. The style is informal and accessible, blending personal anecdote with philosophical exploration without becoming overly academic. Listeners who enjoy casual, meandering discussions about philosophy's application to everyday life and behind-the-scenes podcast reflections will appreciate this episode. Those seeking a tightly structured, debate-focused episode or new philosophical arguments might find it less engaging.

As heard by us

A salvaged conversation that turns a missed debate into a relaxed, responsive philosophy catch-up.

A missed Oxford debate gives Jack Symes and Olly Marley room to do something looser: they settle into a self-aware catch-up after the planned Evil God Challenge discussion falls away.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

When a lost debate turns into a wide-ranging two-host philosophy catch-up.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast