Wellington vs Napoleon: The Great Debate

·1 hr 10 min·5 clips

Bernard Cornwell sparked a fiery debate: who was the better commander, Napoleon or Wellington?

The episode opens with host Luke Reynolds framing a debate inspired by author Bernard Cornwell's Facebook post questioning whether Wellington was a better battlefield commander than Napoleon. Liam Telfer defends Wellington, while Zach White argues for Napoleon, though both acknowledge complexities in the comparison. Early on, they grapple with defining 'battlefield general,' considering logistics, strategy, and the scope of command. Zach White criticizes Wellington's victory at Assaye as 'accidental' and messy, contrasting it with Napoleon's deliberate masterpiece at Austerlitz. Liam counters by suggesting Salamanca as Wellington's Austerlitz, but Luke interjects to note differences in intentionality. The conversation shifts to Wellington's diplomatic and statecraft skills, with Luke highlighting his work in Vienna and with Castlereagh. Zach then critiques Wellington for overstepping his remit, such as lobbying to flog troops harder and defying orders to preserve veteran units, arguing this shows a lack of broader strategic vision compared to Napoleon. They debate force multipliers and unit cohesion in provisional battalions versus fresh recruits. The hosts examine motivation, with Zach noting Napoleon inspired his troops while Wellington generated confidence through dependency. A segment addresses anglo-centric perspectives, with Zach arguing Napoleon would have succeeded in the Peninsular War with Wellington's resources, just in a different style. They debunk the 'scum of the earth' myth, explaining it was a private comment by Wellington. The Russian campaign is discussed as a failure of logistics and statecraft rather than pure generalship. In closing, Liam and Zach critique Wellington's premiership, praising his role in Catholic emancipation but noting his overall political failures. The episode ends with calls for listener feedback and patron acknowledgments.

As heard by us

A lively commander debate that keeps returning to Napoleon's Italy and stays strongest when it argues in detail.

The episode works as a commander face off, with Wellington's method set against Napoleon's audacity. It keeps the central campaign contrast in view, and that pays off most when it turns to Napoleon's early Italy operations, where he is outnumbered, starting from a weaker…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Pick sides in a commander debate about Napoleon vs Wellington that earns the shouting.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Napoleonic Wars Podcast