179- The End

May 6, 2012·30 min·2 clips

Duncan argues Rome's fatal mistake was refusing to let Germanic leaders like Stilicho and Aetius become emperors — and that in a parallel universe where they did, the Western Empire survives.

1. The History of Rome closes with episode 179, 'The End,' in which Mike Duncan reflects on the five-year project and delivers his analysis of why the Western Roman Empire fell in 476 AD. 2. Mike Duncan is the host and creator; he began the podcast on July 27, 2007, after failing to find any existing podcast on Roman history while reading Livy's The War with Hannibal. 3. The episode functions as both a series finale and a standalone essay arguing that Rome's fall cannot be reduced to one or two causes but reflects at least six interacting categories of failure. 4. Duncan summarizes the podcast's journey: from the quasi-mythical kings through the Punic Wars, the Gracchi, the fall of the Republic, the Julio-Claudians, the Crisis of the Third Century — which he covers in 16 episodes — through Diocletian, Constantine, and the final shadow emperors. 5. He reveals the show nearly ended at episode 33, on Marius and Sulla, when he 'completely burned out' and went on a seven-month hiatus before buying a new laptop and deciding he would 'hate himself forever' if he quit. 6. After cataloging the show's statistics — 675,000 words, 189 episodes, 74 hours of content — Duncan stops at 476 AD out of 'a vague sense of historical convention,' noting that one could argue Rome didn't truly end until the Ottoman cannons breached the Theodosian walls in 1453. 7. The first category of failure Duncan cites is political: the centralized apparatus that Diocletian introduced had become 'a brittle farce' by 476, with cloistered emperors totally disconnected from the empire they ran and a hopelessly corrupt bureaucracy that the best-educated men avoided. 8. On the economic factors, Duncan describes how inflation destroyed the western middle class and left the empire divided between 'a few super-wealthy landowners and uncountable poor masses,' with the poor turning to wealthy patrons for tax relief and becoming indentured servants in arrangements that 'laid the groundwork for the feudal system that would rule Europe for the next thousand years.' 9. On military factors, Duncan explains that by the 400s the Roman legions were essentially dead — citizens saw service as 'slavery by another name' — and the empire increasingly relied on Germanic mercenaries who eventually fought under their own kings rather than Roman officers after Adrianople. 10. Duncan calls the social/integration factor his 'personal hobby horse': Rome's historic ability to absorb new peoples had saved it in the 3rd century, when Illyrian officers like Claudius Gothicus, Aurelian, and Diocletian led Rome's revival. 11. But in the 5th century, the Italian aristocracy 'became obsessed with racial prejudices,' keeping the most capable men of the age — Stilicho, Aetius, Alaric, Genseric, Theodoric — at arm's distance from real imperial power. 12. Duncan explicitly asks why Stilicho and Aetius never became emperor, and posits that in a parallel universe where Germanic integration succeeded, German emperors would have revived Rome as the Illyrian emperors had done centuries earlier. 13. On religious factors, Duncan is careful to reject Gibbon's argument that Christianity caused Rome's fall, but argues that it introduced 'constant religious feuding previously unknown to the Romans,' with cycles of purges between Nicaeans, Arians, pagans, and various heresies draining resources and energy from governance. 14. On environmental factors, Duncan notes emerging evidence of wild climate fluctuations between 250 and 550 AD that undermined agricultural predictability, combined with plague and depopulation creating abandoned land and more frequent famines. 15. Duncan then explains why the Eastern Empire survived: geographically, the Rhine-Danube frontiers left the West completely exposed once breached, while in the East Constantinople's walls channeled invaders into Thrace and kept Syria and Egypt — the economic lifeblood — permanently shielded. 16. Economically, the Eastern middle class kept running the Byzantine bureaucracy rather than retreating to private estates, and imperial service remained a 'lucrative and honorable career choice,' unlike the West where Duncan says the bureaucracy was 'staffed by sadistic gangsters.' 17. Duncan closes by saying history 'is being constantly rewritten and frankly that is the one thing that will remain constant,' and expresses deep appreciation to his listeners, saying without an audience he would have 'quit being able to justify spending so much time reading and writing and thinking about Roman history.' 18. He teases his next project, saying it will be neither ancient history nor American history and that he is 'really really excited about it' — this was the Revolutions podcast, which launched shortly after. 19. This episode is ideal for History of Rome listeners at the end of the series, or for anyone interested in a concise analytical overview of theories about Rome's fall. 20. Listeners looking for new information about specific events or emperors will find this episode deliberately synthetic and retrospective rather than narrative.

As heard by us

A clear final accounting of Rome's western collapse, strongest on how central power, bureaucracy, inflation, and taxation wore the empire down.

Rome's western collapse comes across as a state failure, not a tidy fall-of-an-empire moment. By 476 AD, the Western Empire's machinery is described as brittle: emperors held immense theoretical power, but that power sat inside a court culture cut off from the empire it claimed…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a clean map of the pressures that pushed the Western Empire toward collapse.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The History of Rome