Shaylah of the Week - Yeshurun - Rabbi Zev Cohen · Rabbi Zev Cohen

Does one need a Kinyan to be a Shutif?

·25 min·2 clips

Rabbi Cohen reveals why a kinyon is essential for acquisition in Jewish law, unlike in secular systems.

This episode examines whether forming a partnership in Jewish law requires a formal act of acquisition, or kinyan. Rabbi Zev Cohen hosts, drawing from his decades of experience in Talmudic study and community leadership. The discussion stems from a foundational question in partnership law explored in the Yachay Kal curriculum. The analysis begins with the principle that acquiring any item, like a car or vase, requires a specific kinyan appropriate to that object. Rabbi Cohen references a conversation with Avi Rifer, a founding member of a synagogue, who emphasized the necessity of a kinyan even for synagogue membership. The diamond trade's custom of saying "mazel kane" is cited as a unique, industry-specific kinyan. The Shulchan Aruch states that a partnership agreement alone is insufficient without a kinyan to finalize it. This is contrasted with secular law, where contracts and payment, not symbolic acts, transfer ownership. A key insight is that a kinyan in a partnership makes the arrangement binding and prevents a partner from unilaterally withdrawing. The discussion explores the conceptual boundary between a partnership and servitude, noting a Jew cannot become an actual *eved*, or slave, to another. The Derashah's commentary is presented, explaining that partners are not masters over each other, which differentiates the relationship from prohibited servitude. This framework is tested with the example of military service, where a soldier cannot quit but is not considered a slave. The conversation questions why a father does not need a kinyan to appoint a *mohel* for a circumcision, unlike other agency appointments. One proposed explanation is that the *mohel* becomes an extension of the father, "like a wife," rather than a separate agent. Rabbi Cohen shares a personal anecdote about a non-religious lawyer father concerned about legal obligations during a circumcision ceremony. The episode also tangentially mentions the laws of a *shomer*, or watchman, who can quit guarding an item but remains financially liable if it is stolen after he quits. The tone is deeply educational and conversational, weaving complex legal concepts with personal stories and hypothetical scenarios. The style is exploratory, often posing questions and considering various rabbinic opinions without definitive conclusion. Listeners interested in the intricate mechanics of Jewish civil law and partnership formation will find this episode compelling. Those seeking a broad, introductory topic or a narrative-driven podcast might find the highly technical discussion less engaging.

As heard by us

A halachic discussion of partnership, authority, and why making a kinyan matters.

This talk centers on a halachic question about whether a kinyan is needed for a partnership to take hold, then tracks what changes once two people are treated as shutfim rather than as owner and servant.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a halacha discussion that treats partnership and obligation like real legal problems.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Shaylah of the Week - Yeshurun - Rabbi Zev Cohen