You Control Your Health

·1 hr 18 min·5 clips

Science is "observe, measure, and then predict things," and marketing can fake the rest.

Don Murphy opens the episode by welcoming Daniel Toshin and outlining his academic and research background. Dan has graduate training in stem cell biology from the University of British Columbia and a bachelor of science in general biology. He also worked in research on the molecular profiling of exercise, looking into comprehensive blood panels and methods for biological aging calculation. Don asks whether he should call him Dan or Daniel, and Dan says Dan is common. The conversation quickly moves into the science behind health and aging. Don says he wants to talk about genetics, fasting, and telomeres. The interview stays personal and practical, especially because Don notes that his own background is in medical research, making the exchange feel more like a conversation between scientists than a formal lecture. A central theme is the difference between being healthy and optimizing health. Dan describes the frustration of a system that often sees people only when they are already sick. He jokes that if someone walks into a doctor’s office saying they are healthy but want to get healthier, they may be told to leave and come back later. That setup leads into the broader idea of health optimization. The episode also lingers on how individual biology changes the meaning of diet advice. A raw-food pattern may work well for one person and fail later in the same person’s life. The same food or strategy is not automatically right forever. Dan points out that people can look normal on blood tests and still have a very different internal picture. He talks about having seen blood panels with hundreds of markers, sometimes even up to 1,000, though he has only looked at a few of those because they take too long. The point is not just volume. It is that the body contains a dense molecular orchestra, and most changes are not simple cause-and-effect stories. He brings up bystander effects and compensatory mechanisms to explain why symptoms and benefits are often indirect. Even brothers can differ substantially. The interview keeps returning to exercise physiology as the best lens he found for this kind of work. That field became the bridge between his molecular biology background and the real-world question of resilience to disease. Don and Dan keep the tone accessible. Technical terms are allowed, but they are unpacked for listeners. The conversation is not rushed. It lets the reasoning unfold. Don and Dan also touch on the limits of conventional medicine when it comes to prevention and improvement rather than treatment. The episode frames that gap as a problem worth solving. Toward the end, the discussion widens to the role of biotechnology and the need to keep evidence moving forward. Dan argues that nothing should really be off the chopping block, and Don echoes the point by pushing for advances that could benefit people more directly. The episode closes with a mention of the show’s blog pages, where listeners can read more about the guest and the topics covered. It ends on the familiar note of curiosity and continued questioning.

As heard by us

Health is treated as a measurement problem, not a slogan.

The episode treats health as something to measure and manage, moving from aging and genetics to fasting, telomeres, and exercise physiology. Don Murphy keeps it practical.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want health science that starts with your blood, not a slogan.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Nature and Science Podcast