What’s Going On With USAID? | David Ditch

·22 min·2 clips

USAID spent $2.5 million on LGBT activism in Guatemala and $47,000 on a transgender opera in Colombia with U.S. taxpayer funds.

The episode opens with a list of controversial USAID grants, including $2.5 million for LGBT activism in Guatemala and $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia. Host introduces David Ditch, a Senior Policy Analyst at the Heritage Foundation's Grover M. Herman Center for the Federal Budget. Ditch explains that USAID was created under President Kennedy during the Cold War to build goodwill and compete with the Soviet Union. He states that USAID now spends about $40 billion annually on humanitarian assistance and economic development. Ditch distinguishes USAID from the State Department, noting USAID targets poorer countries. The discussion turns to the Trump administration's focus on foreign aid spending, including a proposal to fold USAID into the State Department. Ditch criticizes mission drift in foreign policy, arguing taxpayers fund activities with unclear benefits. He describes a network of NGOs as primary beneficiaries of USAID money, often with left-wing agendas. Specific grant examples include charging stations for electric motorcycles in Uganda and $20 million for renewable electricity in Lebanon. Ditch mentions a $45 million diversity and inclusion scholarship in Myanmar, imposing DEI on a poor country. The episode covers the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) investigating waste in foreign aid. Ditch explains the Trump administration's spending freeze on federal grants, which faced legal challenges. He details impoundment, where executive agencies withhold funds deemed wasteful or unconstitutional. Ditch believes the administration is taking federal spending seriously for the first time in generations. He emphasizes the need for public awareness, as mainstream media often ignores grant abuses. When asked why $40 billion for USAID matters, Ditch compares it to the income of 600,000 American households. He argues Washington does not appreciate the hard work behind such sums. The episode concludes with thanks to Ditch and production credits.

As heard by us

A direct Heritage Foundation argument for tighter political and financial scrutiny of USAID grants.

USAID serves here as the pressure point for a larger argument about federal spending, public money, and the boundaries of government. Heritage Explains starts with disputed grants tied to projects in Serbia, Ireland, Vietnam, Colombia, Guatemala, and Afghanistan, then brings in…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want to understand why USAID moved into the spotlight? Start with the grants, then follow Heritage Explains as David Ditch argues that DOGE and OMB are targeting federal waste.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Heritage Explains