FT Alphachat · Financial Times

Banking culture since the crisis

May 10, 2019·42 min·3 clips

Why did Iceland jail bankers after the crisis while the U.S. let them off, fueling a decade of public anger?

1. FT Alphachat features Brendan Greeley in conversation with Stuart McIntosh of the Group of 30, Nick LaPan (former superintendent of financial institutions for Canada), and Elizabeth St. Ange of Oliver Wyman. 2. The episode discusses a March Group of 30 report on banking culture: what went wrong since the financial crisis and what banks need to change. 3. The core question is why a financial crisis as severe as 2008 failed to produce meaningful cultural change in banking, and what needs to happen differently. 4. Greeley opens by contrasting Iceland, which jailed its former prime minister and most leading bankers, with the United States, which prosecuted executives after the savings and loan crisis and after Enron but chose not to after 2008. 5. Stuart McIntosh argues that failure to prosecute was one reason meaningful reform did not follow the crisis, citing it as a missed signal to the industry that society was serious about accountability. 6. McIntosh also frames fixing banking culture as an inherently long-term project requiring constant focus from CEOs and boards, not a one-time intervention. 7. Nick LaPan distinguishes between enforcement after the fact and permanent structural changes needed beforehand: both are necessary, and declaring victory at any point is not possible. 8. Elizabeth St. Ange argues that organisations want employees to do the right thing because they want to, not just because rules require it, and that those employees come to work fully engaged when they believe in the organisation's purpose. 9. The robo-signing scandal, in which banks foreclosed on people without proper documentation, is diagnosed as the product of three failures: prioritising speed over legal process, linking pay directly to sales volume regardless of conduct, and pushing unresolved trade-offs to frontline staff with no framework for handling them. 10. Nick LaPan argues that any senior leader who avoids articulating hard choices is laundering those choices downward, leaving frontline employees to make unguided judgement calls in situations that are not black and white. 11. Greeley invokes the military skipper standard: if the ship runs aground, the officer on deck's career ends regardless of who was at the wheel, because responsibility is absolute. McIntosh confirms that bank boards have the exact same authority today and consistently fail to exercise it preemptively. 12. The panel notes that banks most effective at cultural reform tend to be medium-sized single-country firms where the CEO knows all managing directors personally and can telegraph behavioural expectations throughout the organisation. 13. McIntosh raises the concern that the very largest global banks with 250,000 employees across all major markets may be too complex to manage culturally: 'too big to fail but also too big to succeed.' 14. Greeley asks why no CEO has ever said on a quarterly earnings call that returns are down because the bank is trying to be better people; the panel responds that the purpose of cultural reform is to guarantee the firm's continued existence rather than any specific return, because without public trust the firm cannot survive. 15. Stuart McIntosh notes that talented young graduates are choosing technology over finance partly because of repeated conduct failures in banking, and that repairing this will take a long time. 16. The panel argues that MBA programmes that refuse to teach ethics are failing their students, since those graduates go on to run major institutions, and that ethics teaching needs to cover real-world trade-offs rather than abstract principles. 17. Greeley observes that many people operate in two separate ethical spheres: personal ethics where they would never steal, and professional ethics where the same behaviour is rationalised as shareholder-driven necessity. 18. A Louisiana community banker is quoted as saying 'I have to be good to my customers because I go to church with them'—cited as the kind of proximity and community accountability that is absent in large international banks. 19. The episode has the tone of a policy-forum discussion: measured, analytical, with occasional moments of sharpness from Greeley pressing for concrete examples and the panellists offering carefully hedged observations. 20. Listeners who work in financial services, banking regulation, or corporate governance and want a structured framework for diagnosing and addressing cultural failures will find this episode practically useful.

As heard by us

A sharp discussion of why bank culture still comes down to accountability after the crisis.

Banking culture after the financial crisis is framed here as a question of responsibility, not etiquette. Brendan Greeley starts with a blunt contrast: Iceland put people in jail, the United States did so after the savings and loan crisis and Enron, but not after 2008.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want the cleanest argument for why 2008 changed so little inside banks.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from FT Alphachat