A Difference of Opinions, with guests Bodhi and Sam

·1 hr 44 min·5 clips

Two massage therapists clash over whether evidence-based practice actually improves patient care or just repackages old ideas.

The episode begins with casual banter among hosts Mark and Amanda, who are both registered massage therapists in Toronto, and their guests Bodhi and Sam. Bodhi introduces himself as an RMT since 1993, originally from Iceland, where he studied hotel management and nursing before moving to Canada for massage therapy education. He practiced in Ontario and Iceland before settling in BC. The hosts explore Bodhi's perspective on advancing the massage therapy profession, including his advocacy for degree programs to enable RMTs to work in hospitals and research roles. Bodhi cites a survey showing 70% support for degrees among BC therapists. The discussion then turns to regulatory changes in BC, where the government amalgamated health professions into four colleges, placing massage therapy under the College of Complementary Health Professionals alongside naturopathy and acupuncture. Bodhi explains that this move reduced professional autonomy and shifted public perception. Later, the hosts facilitate a debate between Bodhi and Sam, who appeared in a previous episode. Sam critiques evidence-based practice as not adding new skills, while Bodhi defends it as essential for integrating research, clinical expertise, and patient values. Their exchange becomes heated as they disagree on systematic reviews, best practice guidelines, and epistemological questions about proving patient outcomes. The episode concludes without resolution, highlighting differing opinions within the profession.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from 2 Massage Therapists and a Microphone